Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 46
Filter
1.
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact ; 23(2): 196-204, 2023 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20243682

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Skeletal muscle area (SMA) at T4 level on chest computed tomography (CT) is a newly available method that can be used as a surrogate sarcopenia marker. The objective of this study is to evaluate association of SMA with adverse COVID-19 outcomes in hospitalized patients. METHODS: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients were prospectively recorded in a database containing age, gender, date of admission, date of outcome (discharge, mortality, presence of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, additional coding information (comorbidities, superimposed conditions). Admission CT-scans were retrospectively evaluated for segmentation (bilateral pectoralis major/minor, erector spinae, levator scapulae, rhomboideus minor and major and transversospinalis muscles) and SMA calculation using 3-D slicer software. RESULTS: 167 cases were evaluated (68 male, 72 female, 140 survived, 27 dead). Muscle area was lower in patients with ICU stay (p=0.023, p=0.018, p=0.008) and mortality outcome (p=0.004, p=0.007, p=0.002) for pectoralis, back and SMA. In multivariate Cox-regression analysis, hazard ratio (HR) value for the pectoralis muscle area value below 2800 mm2 was found to be 3.138(95% CI: 1.171-8.413) for mortality and 2.361(95% CI: 1.012-5.505) for ICU. CONCLUSIONS: Pectoralis muscle area measured at T4 level with 3-D slicer was closely associated with adverse outcomes (mortality, ICU stay) in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Since early treatment methods for COVID-19 are being evaluated, this method may be a useful adjunct to clinical decision making in regard to prioritization.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sarcopenia , Humans , Male , Female , Pectoralis Muscles/physiology , Retrospective Studies , Muscle, Skeletal/diagnostic imaging , Sarcopenia/diagnostic imaging , Sarcopenia/epidemiology
2.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 14: 1162936, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20238773

ABSTRACT

Background: Emerging evidence suggested that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients were more prone to acute skeletal muscle loss and suffer sequelae, including weakness, arthromyalgia, depression and anxiety. Meanwhile, it was observed that sarcopenia (SP) was associated with susceptibility, hospitalization and severity of COVID-19. However, it is not known whether there is causal relationship between COVID-19 and SP-related traits. Mendelian randomization (MR) was a valid method for inferring causality. Methods: Data was extracted from the COVID-19 Host Genetic Initiative and the UK Biobank without sample overlapping. The MR analysis was performed with inverse variance weighted, weighted median, MR-Egger, RAPS and CAUSE, MR-APSS. Sensitivity analysis was conducted with MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran's Q test, MR-PRESSO to eliminate pleiotropy. Results: There was insufficient result in the MR-APSS method to support a direct causal relationship after the Bonferroni correction. Most other MR results were also nominally consistent with the MR-APSS result. Conclusions: Our study first explored the causal relationship between COVID-19 and SP-related traits, but the result indicated that they may indirectly interact with each other. We highlighted that older people had better absorb enough nutrition and strengthen exercise to directly cope with SP during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sarcopenia , Humans , Aged , Sarcopenia/epidemiology , Sarcopenia/genetics , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/genetics , Mendelian Randomization Analysis , Pandemics , Muscle, Skeletal
4.
Clin Nutr ESPEN ; 56: 1-8, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2311176

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Evidence shows that CT-derived sarcopenia can predict adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients. However, discrepancies exist as to which vertebral level can be used to calculate sarcopenia which can effectively serve as a prognostic tool. Thus, we aim to investigate the difference in sarcopenia calculated at the Thoracic and Lumbar vertebral levels. METHODS: An online literature search was conducted on Electronic databases such as PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google scholar. Meta-analysis was performed by using Revman 5.3 software. RESULTS: A total of 14 articles were selected for meta-analysis. The prevalence of sarcopenia calculated at the Thoracic level was 31% (95%CI 24%-37%; p < 0.00001; I2 = 86%), while sarcopenia calculated at the Lumbar vertebral level was 63% (95%CI 51%-75%; p < 0.00001; I2 = 88%). Meanwhile, sarcopenia calculated at the Upper thoracic level was a significant predictor of mortality OR 3.47 (95%CI 1.74-6.91; p = 0.0004; I2 = 56%)as compared to sarcopenia calculated at the lower thoracic OR 1.74 (95%Cl 0.91-3.33; p = 0.10; I2 = 60%)or lumbar level OR 2.49 (95%CI 0.45-13.72; p = 0.30; I2 = 57%). In addition to this sarcopenia calculated at the Upper thoracic level was also a significant predictor of severe illness OR 3.92 (95%CI 2.33-6.58; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%) as compared to lower thoracic OR 1.40 (95%CI 0.78-2.53; p = 0.26; I2 = 67%) or lumbar level OR 1.64 (95%CI 0.26-10.50; p = 0.60; I2 = 81%) CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia calculated at the thoracic vertebrae and lumber level has different prognostic values. Sarcopenia is prevalent at the lumbar level. Sarcopenia at the thoracic level has a higher mortality and severity rate.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sarcopenia , Humans , Sarcopenia/diagnosis , Sarcopenia/epidemiology , Prognosis , Patients , Prevalence
6.
Sao Paulo Med J ; 141(4): e2022159, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2307464

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Social distancing has led to lifestyle changes among older adults during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to estimate the prevalence risk of sarcopenia (RS) and investigate its associated factors during the COVID-19 pandemic in older Brazilian adults. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional observational analysis of baseline data as part of the Remobilize Study. METHODS: Participants in the study were older adults (≥ 60 years), excluding those who were bedridden or institutionalized. The data collected consisted of answers about the RS (SARC-F), functional status, walking, sedentary behavior (SB), pain, comorbidity, and life space mobility. RESULTS: A total of 1,482 older adults (70 ± 8.14 years, 74% women) participated in the study, and an RS prevalence of 17.1% was found. (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.25-19.15%). The adjusted multivariate model showed a significant association between RS and functional limitation (odds ratio [OR]: 19.05; CI 13.00-28.32), comorbidity (OR: 5.11; CI 3.44-7.81), pain (OR: 4.56; CI 3.33-6.28), total walking (OR: 0.99; CI 0.99-1.00), SB of 8-10 hours (OR: 1.85; CI 1.15-2.93), and SB of > 10 hours (OR: 3.93; CI 2.48-6.22). RS was associated with mobility during the pandemic (OR: 0.97; CI 0.96-0.98). P < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: During the pandemic, the prevalence of RS in older Brazilians was estimated at 17.1%. Moderate to severe functional limitation, comorbidities, presence of pain, walking, longer SB period, and reduced life space mobility significantly contributed to RS in older adults during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sarcopenia , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Brazil/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pain , Pandemics , Prevalence , Sarcopenia/epidemiology
7.
BMC Psychiatry ; 23(1): 284, 2023 04 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2297804

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2020, Lebanon has witnessed its worst economic crisis, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic and a massive explosion of its capital. Amidst these stressors, this study aims at assessing the prevalence of depression, anxiety, suicidality, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and cognitive impairment in patients undergoing hemodialysis in an academic hospital destroyed by the explosion. METHODS: This cross-sectional study conducted 6 months after the blast included adults on hemodialysis, with no previous diagnoses of dementia or intellectual disability. It explores prevalence rates of psychiatric disorders, in addition to other medical and psychosocial variables such as frailty, malnutrition, sarcopenia, quality of life and religiosity. RESULTS: Forty two patients (mean age 66.1; SD: 11.2 years) undergoing hemodialysis for 6.12 years (SD:7.22 years) were included. Anxiety and depression rates reached 54.8% and 57.1% using cut-offs of 6 and 7 respectively on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression rating Scale. 9.5% of the patients reported being in the hospital at the time of the blast and 7.1% reported being injured. 33.3% screened positively for PTSD using a cut-off of 23 on the PCL-5. 26.2% had passive death wishes and 7.1% had suicide plans, however no one had attempted it. 23.8% were found cognitively impaired as shown by the Mini-Cog (<3). Around two-third of participants were moderately to severely malnourished per the GLIM criteria. One third suffered from frailty, according to the FRAIL screening tool. Around 60% suffered from sarcopenia, based on handgrip strength measures. These findings contrast with "acceptable to good" quality of life subjectively reported by participants on the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey. While one-third of participants participated in organizational religious activities, 88% reported significant subjective meaning of religion in their heart. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of depression, anxiety, PTSD, suicidality, and cognitive impairment were found to be alarming in the setting of an urban dialysis unit following a major explosion. Psychiatric disorders were found to be compounded with increased prevalence of malnutrition, frailty, and sarcopenia. These findings urge healthcare providers to implement early diagnostic and intervention strategies to improve both mental and physical wellbeing of this vulnerable population, in similar settings.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Frailty , Sarcopenia , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Adult , Humans , Aged , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pandemics , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Frailty/epidemiology , Hand Strength , Sarcopenia/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/epidemiology , Renal Dialysis
8.
Clin Nutr ; 41(12): 2934-2939, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2149545

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: COVID-19 patients present a high hospitalization rate with a high mortality risk for those requiring intensive care. When these patients have other comorbid conditions and older age, the risk for severe disease and poor outcomes after ICU admission are increased. The present work aims to describe the preliminary results of the ongoing NUTRICOVID study about the nutritional and functional status and the quality of life of adult COVID-19 survivors after ICU discharge, emphasizing the in-hospital and discharge situation of this population. METHODS: A multicenter, ambispective, observational cohort study was conducted in 16 public hospitals of the Community of Madrid with COVID-19 survivors who were admitted to the ICU during the first outbreak. Preliminary results of this study include data retrospectively collected. Malnutrition and sarcopenia were screened at discharge using MUST and SARC-F; the use of healthcare resources was measured as the length of hospital stay and requirement of respiratory support and tracheostomy during hospitalization; other study variables were the need for medical nutrition therapy (MNT); and patients' functional status (Barthel index) and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). RESULTS: A total of 176 patients were included in this preliminary analysis. Most patients were male and older than 60 years, who suffered an average (SD) weight loss of 16.6% (8.3%) during the hospital stay, with a median length of stay of 53 (27-89.5) days and a median ICU stay of 24.5 (11-43.5) days. At discharge, 83.5% and 86.9% of the patients were at risk of malnutrition and sarcopenia, respectively, but only 38% were prescribed MNT. In addition, more than 70% of patients had significant impairment of their mobility and to conduct their usual activities at hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary analysis evidences the high nutritional and functional impairment of COVID-19 survivors at hospital discharge and highlights the need for guidelines and systematic protocols, together with appropriate rehabilitation programs, to optimize the nutritional management of these patients after discharge.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Malnutrition , Sarcopenia , Adult , Humans , Male , Female , Quality of Life , COVID-19/epidemiology , Sarcopenia/epidemiology , Functional Status , Retrospective Studies , Intensive Care Units , Hospitalization , Survivors , Malnutrition/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Nutritional Status
9.
Nutrition ; 105: 111871, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2150360

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the applicability of the strength, assistance with walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls (SARC-F) questionnaire by telephone to identify sarcopenia risk (SR; SARC-F ≥6) and low muscle function risk (LMFR; SARC-F ≥ 4) and their associated risk factors in a cohort of community-dwelling older adults in southern Brazil. METHODS: A longitudinal study was carried out with community-dwelling older individuals from COMO VAI? STUDY: Sociodemographic, behavioral, and health-related information were collected at baseline, and, in the second assessment, the SARC-F questionnaire was applied by phone or in-person interviews. Older adults identified with sarcopenia at the baseline assessment were excluded. Adjusted analysis by Poisson regression according to hierarchical levels was performed. RESULTS: Of the 1451 participants interviewed at baseline, only 951 participated in the second assessment. During the second assessment, 732 adults (77%) were interviewed by phone and 219 (23%) in person. There was no statistically significant difference for the SR (9.1 versus 9.7%, P = 0.802) and LMFR (22.4 versus 20.0%, P = 0.435) prevalence when the SARC-F questionnaire was administered in person or by phone, respectively. Age ≥80 y, presence of depressive symptoms, multimorbidity, dependence to perform one or more daily activities, and polypharmacy were factors associated with a higher risk for poor outcomes in older adults interviewed by phone. CONCLUSIONS: The similar prevalence between in-person and remote assessments suggests the feasibility of using the SARC-F questionnaire by phone interview as a reliable alternative for sarcopenia and low muscle function risk assessment without the requirement of face-to-face evaluations.


Subject(s)
Sarcopenia , Humans , Aged , Sarcopenia/diagnosis , Sarcopenia/epidemiology , Geriatric Assessment , Longitudinal Studies , Mass Screening , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
BMC Pulm Med ; 22(1): 223, 2022 Jun 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2139243

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Post-COVID-19 syndrome is characterized by diverse symptoms and abnormalities that persist beyond 12 weeks from the onset of acute COVID-19. Severity disease has been associated with more musculoskeletal alterations such as muscle weakness, dyspnea, and distance walking. The aim was to evaluate the impact of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) on body composition and investigate risk factors associated with sarcopenia in post-COVID-19 patients three months after moderate or severe COVID-19 infections. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. 530 patients with PCR-confirmed diagnoses of moderate to severe COVID-19, > 18 years old, oxygen saturation ≤ 93%, PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 300, who required hospitalization and were discharged were included. We excluded those who died before the follow-up visit, declined to participate, or could not be contacted. RESULTS: The mean age was 53.79 ± 12.90 years. IMV subjects had lower phase angle and handgrip strength and higher impedance index, frequency of low muscle mass, and low muscle strength than those without IMV. The risk factors of sarcopenia were > 60 years of age, diabetes, obesity, IMV, and prolonged hospital stay. The multivariate model showed that age > 60 years (OR: 4.91, 95% CI: 2.26-10.63), obesity (OR: 3.73, 95% CI: 1.21-11.54), and interaction between prolonged length of hospital stay and IMV (OR: 2.92; 95% CI: 1.21-7.02) were related to a higher risk of sarcopenia. CONCLUSION: Obesity and the interaction between prolonged length of hospital stay and IMV are associated with a higher risk of sarcopenia at 3 months after severe or moderate COVID-19 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sarcopenia , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Body Composition , COVID-19/complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hand Strength , Humans , Middle Aged , Obesity , Respiration, Artificial , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Sarcopenia/epidemiology , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
11.
Nutrients ; 14(23)2022 Nov 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2123777

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: The loss of muscle mass in post-critical COVID-19 outpatients is difficult to assess due to the limitations of techniques and the high prevalence of obesity. Ultrasound is an emerging technique for evaluating body composition. The aim is to evaluate sarcopenia and its risk factors, determining ultrasound usefulness as a potential tool for this purpose according to established techniques, such as the bioimpedance vector analysis (BIVA), handgrip strength, and timed up-and-go test. Methods: This is a transversal study of 30 post-critical COVID-19 outpatients. We evaluated nutritional status by ultrasound (Rectus Femoris-cross-sectional-area (RF-CSA), thickness, and subcutaneous-adipose-tissue), BIVA, handgrip strength, timed up-and-go test, and clinical variables during admission. Results: According to The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism and the European Association for the Study of Obesity (ESPEN&EASO) Consensus for Sarcopenic and Obesity, in terms of excess fat mass and decreased lean mass, the prevalence of class-1 sarcopenic obesity was 23.4% (n = 7), and class-2 sarcopenic obesity was 33.3% (n = 10) in our study. A total of 46.7% (n = 14) of patients had a handgrip strength below the 10th percentile, and 30% (n = 9) achieved a time greater than 10s in the timed up-and-go test. There were strong correlations between the different techniques that evaluated the morphological (BIVA, Ultrasound) and functional measurements of muscle. Intensive care unit stay, mechanical ventilation, and age all conditioned the presence of sarcopenia in COVID-19 outpatients (R2 = 0.488, p = 0.002). Predictive models for sarcopenic diagnosis based on a skeletal muscle index estimation were established by RF-CSA (R2 0.792, standard error of estimate (SEE) 1.10, p < 0.001), muscle-thickness (R2 0.774, SEE 1.14, p < 0.001), and handgrip strength (R2 0.856, SEE 0.92, p < 0.001). RF-CSA/weight of 5.3 cm2/kg × 100 was the cut-off value for predicting sarcopenia in post-critical COVID-19 outpatients, with 88.2 sensitivity and 69.2% specificity. Conclusion: More than half of the post-critical COVID-19 survivors had sarcopenic obesity and functional impairment of handgrip strength. Intensive care unit stay, age, and mechanical ventilation all predict sarcopenia. An ultrasound, when applied to the assessment of body composition in post-critical COVID-19 patients, provided the possibility of assessing sarcopenia in this population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sarcopenia , Humans , RNA, Viral , Hand Strength , Cross-Sectional Studies , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Sarcopenia/diagnostic imaging , Sarcopenia/epidemiology , Quadriceps Muscle , Muscle, Skeletal/diagnostic imaging , Obesity/epidemiology
12.
Clin Nutr ESPEN ; 51: 143-151, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2049033

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Sarcopenia, frailty, and COVID-19 appear to be intertwined. Preventive and intervention measures are required to break this link and mitigate the consequences of rising morbidity and mortality among older adults. This study aimed to identify and synthesize important factors related to the interaction of the devastating trio and their impact on the health and mortality of older adults. METHODS: Data were gathered via searches of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Elsevier Mendeley Website. Study selection and data extraction were conducted by the two authors independently. The primary outcome was mortality, secondary outcomes included hospitalization and risk of development of severe disease among older Covid-19 patients. The study results are presented as adjusted odds and hazard ratios with 95% CI. RESULTS: A total of 1725 studies were identified through our electronic databases searches. After screening and assessing for eligibility, 39 studies were included in this review, a total of 51,796 patients were included in the systematic review. Our results indicated that frail patients recorded a higher mean age compared to non-frail patients (p < 0.00001), and COVID-19 frail patients had significantly increased mortality rate compared to non-frail patients, the log adjusted OR was 2.10 (1.63, 2.71); I2 = 78%; p < 0.00001. CONCLUSION: Age and frailty are important risk factors for mortality among older adults COVID-19 patients. COVID-19 patients with sarcopenia had a higher risk of developing severe conditions, including hospitalization and ICU admission. Findings that support the use of frailty and sarcopenia indicators to help in the decision-making process for medical care in older adults COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Frailty , Sarcopenia , Aged , Frail Elderly , Frailty/diagnosis , Hospitalization , Humans , Sarcopenia/complications , Sarcopenia/epidemiology
13.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(18)2022 Sep 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2032944

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic significantly affected the physical and mental functions in older adults, resulting in "corona-frailty". This 2-year prospective study characterized changes in quantitative measures and corona-frailty among a cohort of community-dwelling older women. Changes were evaluated using face-to-face interactions with 39 Japanese women (mean age: 76.1 ± 5.9) in 2019 (pre-pandemic baseline) and 2021 (follow-up during the pandemic). Quantitative measurements of handgrip strength, walking speed, calf circumference, body composition, and background factors were evaluated. Body weight and trunk muscle mass significantly decreased at follow-up. Multiple regression analysis, using change in trunk muscle mass as the dependent variable and background factors as independent variables, identified that decrease in trunk muscle mass was associated with "being robust at baseline" and answering "Yes" to the question of "Do you go out less frequently compared with last year"? The 2-year trunk muscle mass change for each baseline frailty stage showed a significant decrease only in the robust group (-8.0%). The decrease in trunk muscle mass might be related to pandemic-induced lifestyle restraint, suggesting that robust older adults who are healthy and active should take measures that focus on trunk muscles to avoid "corona-frailty".


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Frailty , Sarcopenia , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Frailty/epidemiology , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Hand Strength/physiology , Humans , Independent Living , Japan/epidemiology , Muscle Strength , Muscle, Skeletal/pathology , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , Sarcopenia/epidemiology , Sarcopenia/pathology
14.
Exp Gerontol ; 168: 111945, 2022 10 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2007699

ABSTRACT

Patients with COVID-19 may develop symptoms that interfere with food intake. Systemic inflammatory response associated with physical inactivity and/or immobilization during hospital stay can induce weight and muscle loss leading to sarcopenia and worsening the clinical condition of these patients. The present study identifies the frequency and factors associated with sarcopenia prediction in adult and elderly patients hospitalized for COVID-19. It is a cohort-nested cross-sectional study on adult and elderly patients admitted to wards and intensive care units (ICUs) of 8 hospitals in a northeastern Brazilian state. The study was conducted from June 2020 to June 2021. Sociodemographic, economic, lifestyle, and current and past clinical history variables were collected. Sarcopenia prediction was determined by the Strength, Assistance in walking, Rise from a chair, Climb stairs, and Falls (SARC-F) questionnaire compiled in the Remote-Malnutrition APP (R-MAPP). Patients were diagnosed with sarcopenia when the final score ≥ 4 points. The study included 214 patients with a mean age of 61.76 ± 16.91 years, of which 52.3 % were female and 57.5 % elderly. Sarcopenia prevailed in 40.7 % of the sample. Univariate analysis showed greater probability of sarcopenia in elderly individuals, nonpractitioners of physical activities, hypertensive patients, diabetic patients, and those hospitalized in the ICU. In the multivariate model, the type of hospital admission remained associated with sarcopenia prediction, where patients admitted to the ICU were 1.43 (95 % CI: 1.04; 1.97) more likely to have sarcopenia than those undergoing clinical treatment. Sarcopenia prediction was not associated with patient outcome (discharge, transfer, or death) (p = 0.332). The study highlighted an important percentage of sarcopenia prediction in patients with COVID-19, especially those admitted to the ICU. Additional investigations should be carried out to better understand and develop early diagnostic strategies to assist in the management of sarcopenic patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sarcopenia , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Sarcopenia/complications , Sarcopenia/diagnosis , Sarcopenia/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle ; 13(5): 2436-2446, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1935697

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chronic disease causes skeletal muscle loss that contributes to morbidity and mortality. There are limited data on the impact of dynamic muscle loss on clinical outcomes in COVID-19. We hypothesized that acute COVID-19-related muscle loss (acute sarcopenia) is associated with adverse outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospective clinical registry of COVID-19 patients was performed in consecutive hospitalized patients with acute COVID-19 (n = 95) and compared with non-COVID-19 controls (n = 19) with two temporally unique CT scans. Pectoralis muscle (PM), erector spinae muscle (ESM) and 30 day standardized per cent change in cross sectional muscle area were quantified. Primary outcomes included mortality and need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Multivariate linear and logistic regression were performed. Cox proportional hazard ratios were generated for ICU admission or mortality for the per cent muscle loss standardized to 30 days. RESULTS: The COVID-19 CT scan cohort (n = 95) had an average age of 63.3 ± 14.3 years, comorbidities including COPD (28.4%) and diabetes mellitus (42.1%), and was predominantly Caucasian (64.9%). The proportion of those admitted to the ICU was 54.7%, with 10.5% requiring tracheostomy and overall mortality 16.8%. Median duration between CT scans was 32 days (IQR: 16-63 days). Significant reductions in median per cent loss was noted for PM (-2.64% loss [IQR: -0.28, -5.47] in COVID-19 vs. -0.06 loss [IQR: -0.01, -0.28] in non-COVID-19 CT controls, P < 0.001) and ESM (-1.86% loss [IQR: -0.28, -5.47] in COVID-19 vs. -0.06 loss [IQR: -0.02, -0.11]) in non-COVID-19 CT controls, P < 0.001). Multivariate linear regression analysis of per cent loss in PM was significantly associated with mortality (-10.8% loss [95% CI: -21.5 to -0.19]) and ICU admission (-11.1% loss [95% CI: -19.4 to -2.67]), and not significant for ESM. Cox proportional hazard ratios demonstrated greater association with ICU admission (adj HR 2.01 [95% CI: 1.14-3.55]) and mortality (adj HR 5.30 [95% CI: 1.19-23.6]) for those with significant per cent loss in PM, and greater association with ICU admission (adj HR 8.22 [95% CI: 1.11-61.04]) but not mortality (adj HR 2.20 [95% CI: 0.70-6.97]) for those with significant per cent loss in ESM. CONCLUSIONS: In a well-characterized cohort of 95 hospitalized patients with acute COVID-19 and two temporally distinct CT scans, acute sarcopenia, determined by standardized reductions in PM and ESM, was associated with worse clinical outcomes. These data lay the foundation for evaluating dynamic muscle loss as a predictor of clinical outcomes and targeting acute sarcopenia to improve clinical outcomes for COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sarcopenia , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Muscle, Skeletal , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Sarcopenia/epidemiology , Sarcopenia/etiology
16.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 58(6)2022 Jun 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1911464

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: Quarantine, isolation and bed rest associated with COVID-19 infection favored the loss of muscle and bone mass, especially in elderly patients. The current study aims to compare the presence of sarcopenia and osteoporosis in patients with a recent (one month) history of SARS-CoV-2 infection versus the general population. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in which 157 patients were enrolled, divided into two groups, comparable in structure. The COVID-19 group (group C) consisted of 86 patients who were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 respiratory infection within the last 30 days. The non-COVID-19 group (group NC) consists of 71 patients who had no clinical signs of respiratory infection and were not quarantined/hospitalized in the last 3 months. Muscle strength, incidence of sarcopenia (using SARC-F score) and osteoporosis (DEXA determination) and physical performance (SPPB score) in the two groups were assessed and compared. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the SPPB scores of the C group versus the NC group. Statistically significant differences were found in the evaluation of three parameters included in the SARC-F score. Patients in the C group had difficulties in standing up from a chair (p = 0.009) and climbing stairs (p = 0.030) due to lower muscle strength (p = 0.002) compared with patients in the NC group. No correlation of the SARC F and SPPB scores with the T score values obtained by osteo-densitometry was found. Conclusions: The sudden and significant reduction in physical activity, through various measures taken in the general population during the pandemic, led to an increased incidence of sarcopenia, both in patients who did not have COVID-19 infection and among those quarantined/hospitalized for this condition.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Osteoporosis , Sarcopenia , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Sarcopenia/complications , Sarcopenia/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
17.
BMC Geriatr ; 22(1): 446, 2022 05 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1902357

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Muscle health decline with age, but its deterioration in older persons with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) over time is not well-established. This study aimed to determine the change in muscle mass, handgrip strength and gait speed over time among community-dwelling ambulatory older multi-ethnic Asian patients with T2DM and their associated factors. METHODS: Among 387 eligible patients aged 60-89 years who were recruited at baseline, 348 (89.9%) were reviewed at a public primary care clinic in Singapore in the subsequent 9 to 34 months. The change in their clinical and functional status, levels of physical activity and muscle status (mass, grip strength and gait speed based on the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia criteria) were recorded and compared. Their physical activity levels were assessed using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Their quality of life was evaluated based on the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) domains. Linear regression analysis was used to identify the factors associated with muscle health change. RESULTS: The study population comprised men (52.9%), Chinese (69.3%), mean age of 68.4 ± SD5.6 years and had at least secondary education (76.4%). Their mean muscle mass significantly decreased by 0.03 ± SD0.06 kg/m2/month, mean handgrip strength by 0.06 ± SD0.26 kg/month and negligible change in gait speed of 0.002 ± SD0.01 m/sec/month. Their mean weight significantly decreased by 0.5 ± SD3.9 kg, waist and hip circumferences by 2.5 ± SD6cm and 3.2 ± SD5.1 cm respectively, with no change in BMI. Linear regression shows significant associations between muscle mass change and education level (ß = 0.36,p = 0.012, 95% CI = 0.08-0.64), BMI (ß = 0.11,p = < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.05-0.17), change in medication class (ß = 0.39,p = < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.06-0.71) and review interval (ß = - 0.003, p < 0.001, 95% CI = -0.004--0.002). Gait speed change was associated with singlehood (ß = - 0.13,p = 0.029, 95% CI = -0.25--0.01) and WHOQOL physical health (ß = 0.01,p = 0.024, 95% CI = 0.00-0.02) domain. No factor was associated with handgrip strength change. CONCLUSIONS: The study population with T2DM showed significant decline in their mean weight, waist and hip circumferences, mean muscle mass and mean grip strength but gait speed was unaffected. Muscle mass change was associated with education level, BMI and length of review interval. Handgrip strength change was not significantly correlated with any factor. Gait speed change was associated with singlehood and physical health.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Sarcopenia , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Asian People , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Hand Strength/physiology , Humans , Independent Living , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Muscle Strength , Muscles , Quality of Life , Sarcopenia/epidemiology , Walking Speed
18.
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle ; 13(4): 1974-1982, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1885409

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Severe clinical pictures and sequelae of COVID-19 disease are immune mediated and characterized by a 'cytokine storm'. Skeletal muscle has emerged as a potent regulator of immune system function. The aim of the present study is to define the prevalence of sarcopenia among COVID-19 survivors and the negative impact of sarcopenia on the post-acute COVID-19 syndrome and its related risk factors. METHODS: A total of 541 subjects recovered from COVID-19 disease were enrolled in the Gemelli Against COVID-19 Post-Acute Care between April 2020 and February 2021. They underwent a multidisciplinary clinical evaluation and muscle strength and physical performance assessment. RESULTS: Mean age was 53.1 years (SD 15.2, range from 18 to 86 years), and 274 (51%) were women. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 19.5%, and it was higher in patients with a longer hospital stay and lower in patients who were more physically active and had higher levels of serum albumin. Patients with sarcopenia had a higher number of persistent symptoms than non-sarcopenic patients (3.8 ± 2.9 vs. 3.2 ± 2.8, respectively; P = 0.06), in particular fatigue, dyspnoea, and joint pain. CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia identified according to the EWGSOP2 criteria is high in patients recovered from COVID-19 acute illness, particularly in those who had experienced the worst clinical picture reporting the persistence of fatigue and dyspnoea. Our data suggest that sarcopenia, through the persistence of inflammation, could be the biological substrate of long COVID-19 syndrome. Physical activity, especially if associated with adequate nutrition, seems to be an important protective factor.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sarcopenia , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/complications , Dyspnea , Fatigue , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sarcopenia/epidemiology , Sarcopenia/etiology , Young Adult , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
19.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(10)2022 05 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1855628

ABSTRACT

Older adults face the concern of developing frailty and sarcopenia due to an inactive lifestyle during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study aimed to reveal the preventive behaviors taken by older adults who perceived a decline in physical fitness during COVID-19 and analyze the background factors which promoted such behaviors using a qualitative study design in 2020. The participants were recruited through the cohort study of Japanese older adults who were aged 79-81 and had not been diagnosed with sarcopenia previously in 2019 and perceived their physical fitness to have declined during the pandemic. The interviews of 19 participants were analyzed using thematic analysis. The participants engaged in five types of preventive behaviors to counter declining physical fitness: "walking", "exercising at home", "improving daily diet", "maintaining a daily routine", and "taking a good rest". Four themes were extracted pertaining to backgrounds of such preventive behaviors: "feeling anxiety and mental pressure", "available networks with family and neighbors", "prior experiences of behaviors", and "access to information". Anxiety due to lifestyle changes during the pandemic was the primary reason for the behaviors. This study can be a useful guide for undertaking possible measures to prevent frailty during future pandemics.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Frailty , Sarcopenia , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cohort Studies , Humans , Independent Living , Pandemics/prevention & control , Physical Fitness , Sarcopenia/epidemiology
20.
Crit Care ; 26(1): 140, 2022 05 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1849767

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is defined as age-related loss of muscle mass, strength, and/or function in the context of aging. Mechanical ventilation (MV) is one of the most frequently used critical care technologies in critically ill patients. The prevalence of preexisting sarcopenia and the clinical impact of its prognostic value on patients with MV are unclear. This review sought to identify the prevalence and prognostic value of preexisting sarcopenia on MV patient health outcomes. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library and were searched for all articles published as of December 2021. The prevalence of sarcopenia was determined using the authors' definitions from the original studies. Comparisons were made between patients who did and did not have sarcopenia for prognostic outcomes, including mortality, the number of days of MV, the length of intensive care unit stay, and the length of hospital stay. Odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for pooled analyses of the relationships between sarcopenia and prognostic outcomes. RESULTS: The initial search identified 1333 studies, 17 of which met the eligibility criteria for the quantitative analysis, including 3582 patients. The pooled prevalence was 43.0% (95% CI 34.0-51.0%; I2 = 96.7%). The pooled analyses showed that sarcopenia was related to increased mortality (OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.70, 2.67; I2 = 45.0%), longer duration of MV (MD = 1.22; 95% CI 0.39, 2.05; I2 = 97.0%), longer days of ICU stay (MD = 1.31; 95% CI 0.43, 2.19; I2 = 97.0%), and hospital stay (MD 2.73; 95% CI 0.58, 4.88; I2 = 98.0%) in patients with MV. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of sarcopenia is relatively high in patients with MV, and it will have a negative impact on the prognosis of patients. However, further, large-scale, high-quality prospective cohort studies are required.


Subject(s)
Respiration, Artificial , Sarcopenia , Critical Illness/epidemiology , Critical Illness/therapy , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Length of Stay , Prevalence , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Sarcopenia/diagnosis , Sarcopenia/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL